NCAA, House and Texas college
Digest more
Top News
Overview
Impacts
The Big Ten is better equipped to thrive than other conferences in the aftermath of the House v. NCAA lawsuit settlement.
What happens to Purdue's name, image and likeness collectives and fundraising? Here are five frequently asked questions about the future of Boilermakers sports.
Starting July 1, athletic departments will be able to compensate athletes directly from their revenues. Here's how the settlement of House v. NCAA will impact NCAA Division I schools.
The appeal will not impact revenue sharing — slated to start July 1 — but will pause the back-pay damages portion of the settlement.
Could Gonzaga basketball dominate the new NCAA landscape? ESPN’s Dan Wetzel breaks down why the House settlement gives the Zags a major financial edge over in-state rivals like Washington.
Explore more
In a landmark House settlement, schools will be allowed to pay athletes directly for the first time. After over 20 years of litigation, lawsuits and legal red tape, athletes will get compensation directly from the people they play for.
The House settlement has set the stage for revenue-sharing between universities and their athletes. Here's a look at what the settlement means moving forward.
Breaking down what the approval of the House vs. NCAA settlement could mean for Iowa sports now and in the future.
A new general manager, varied and unique funding sources, and a focus on punching above their weight.
Commissioner Teresa Gould said the conference is discussing how to allocate revenue across sports under the terms of the House antitrust lawsuit settlement.